Flower Eric Layman http://digitalchumps.com/media/reviews/photos/original/a1/9f/e2/2303_flogo_123423917577.jpg Hot

Written by Eric Layman     February 10, 2009    
 
9.4
 
1.4 (1)
0   13   0   0   0
 
Write Review

Videogames

Console (if any)
Genre
Release Date
February 12, 2009
Storage Size
628 MB
MSRP $
9.99
ESRB
Players

Relax.

 

I wasn't sure what to expect from Flower. At last year's E3 I was foaming at the mouth for Killzone 2, LittleBigPlanet, Resistance 2, and PixelJunk Eden. I stumbled into SCEA's suite expecting to go right for those titles, but Sony PR had other plans. Instead, I was ushered to an unfamiliar game and left in the presence of its enthusiastic auteur. I figured that, given our relatively unknown presence as a new(er) gaming site, I was being dumped on a second tier title unworthy immediate attention by the majority if the gaming press. The game, of course, was Flower, and the eager gentleman ready to tell me all about it was its creator, thatgamecompany co-founder, Jenova Chen.

I listened to Chen describe his game as if it were piece of interactive poetry. Flowers, I was told, dream of nothing but restoring serenity to barren, lifeless landscapes. As the player, we were to help flowers to fulfill these dreams by simply blossoming other flowers. I was skeptical, but Flower's visual presentation matched his excitement, and it seemed to work in tandem with the budding, orchestrated soundtrack. The whole package conveyed a sense of beauty not often seen gaming. In fact, Chen couldn't escape a sentence without mentioning the word "beauty" at least once, and it was around that point where I began to sense a difference between Chen's fervent passion for his art and the lifeless PR-refuse I had previously been subjected to all day. Chen wasn't speaking in platitudes; I bought in to what he was saying, and, after actually playing the game, was totally on board with the love fest bestowed upon Flower by other members of the gaming press. And now, six months later, surprisingly little has changed...

Grow Up and Blow Away

From a pure gameplay standpoint, Flower might seem unbearably minimalist. Like flOw (thatgamecompanies previous effort), the only methods of input are SIXAXIS motion control along with the use of just one (any) button. Sixaxis points your direction, and the button is used for acceleration. For the first couple levels, you do little more than guide your petals over an open field and blossom other flowers as you sweep past. 360 degrees are at your disposal, and you're free to browse the landscape at your leisure. There is no time limit, no instructive text, and no underlying weight on your shoulders; you cannot lose in any way, shape, or form. The objective is simply to complete the flower's dream and beautify the landscape, which can easily be accomplished by simply gracing over a few more prominent flowers. For all intents and purposes, Flower has very little overt and objective gameplay to speak of.

While a lack of a pure objective or identifiable consequence could (and will) easily be misunderstood as poor game design, it's actually quite brilliant. Flower isn't intended to be played like a typical task-based game; rather, it breaks protocol and focuses solely on providing an experience. There is no carrot for you to chase, hell, you don't even have to "beat" anything in the traditional sense. The sense of satisfaction gained from playing Flower is achieved by simply playing Flower. Flower exists to challenge your senses, not to test your will to overcome odds.

For Your Pleasure, At Your Leisure

The experience of Flower all comes together through its luminous presentation. First and foremast, thatgamecompany unquestionably nailed the sensation of flight. Not since NiGHTS, some twelve years ago, has a game come so close to producing a genuine feeling of soaring through the air. The wind is the primary catalyst for this effect; it rips at your ears when you dive through the grass and crescendos into aural perfection when you return to the sky. With the sun painting the colors of light in every direction, the game almost smells like summer. And, surprisingly, this is all made possible through the previously-thought-to-be-inept sixaxis motion control. flOw, in my opinion, faltered by trying to map motion controls to a 2D plane, but Flower, while occasionally cumbersome, fares far better with the full spectrum of movement at its disposal.

While you can almost feel the wind blowing in your face, Flower's accompanying soundtrack is equally important to its immersive quality. The orchestrated soundtrack is complimented by small musical notes whenever a flower is blossomed, adding a bit of satisfying interactivity to the score at every instance. The change in harmony isn't as symbiotic to the experience as something like Rez, but it plays a huge role in supporting the narrative.

Wait, what? Narrative? Yes, a complete theme is encountered over the course of the game, but, much like everything else here, it eschews conventional plot design in favor of a far more profound and respectful delivery. Rather than rely on blocks of text, dialogue, or long winded cut scenes, the story is delivered solely through the visual presentation and the accompanying audio cues. This is most evident when (SPOILER) abundance of music in the opening levels is left behind in favor ominous strings and haunting melodies; the purveying cheer quickly shifts to a feeling of absolute isolation.(END SPOILER) And the conveyance of this twist is phenomenal; I can't properly articulate how good it feels for a game to not spell everything out and actually trust the mind of its audience to fill in the blanks. Flower is visual story telling at its finest.

In Bloom

While my adoration of this Flower obviously knows no bounds, I suspected perhaps I was just infatuated with avant-garde design and that Flower, while a dream come true for my tastes, would be a little too unfriendly for mainstream audiences. Basically, I didn't know if other people would, so to speak, "get it." Thus, I recruited my roommate, who plays maybe two videogames a year, to spend some time with the game. I held back my expectations and told her nothing about the design (not even what to do with the controller), and then watched with the upmost fulfillment as she discovered the beauty of the game on her own. She was blown away, which canceled out my wariness over Flower's potential inaccessibility. Once it's in your hands, regardless of your familiarity with games, Flower is completely intuitive.

And for those looking for something more (I can sympathize with people who want to play games with their videogame system), Flower does pack a hefty amount of actual gameplay behind all of its nuanced bliss. The later three levels, which I'm doing my best not to spoil, vary the formula a bit without abusing the inherent mechanics. Furthermore, for those determined enough to find every last un-blossomed flower, three petals can be "earned" for each potted plant in your window. Trophies also make an appearance, the most amusing of which correspond perfectly to Flower's ambiance. Again, these tasks aren't things you have to do to breathe in Flower's lush atmosphere, they just appear to be a seamless concession thatgamecompany was willing to make in the wake of flOw's alleged lack of true gameplay. Flower could stand without it, but it's good to know the options are there.

 

Editor reviews

Flower crushes game design conventions and discards them like its confection of petals. In an interview with the SCEA Blog, Chen said, "I think it's a miracle that people actually funded us to make this game," and I can definitely see where he's coming from. I'm as surprised to play and enjoy it as he was to get the chance to make it. My experience wasn't a wild success because it was different from the norm, but for the sole reason that it provided one of the purest feelings of escape I've ever received from a videogame. As a downloadable title its scope and statement may be overlooked, but, from a design standpoint, it's as "next gen" as any title yet. Flower isn't one to be missed.
Overall rating 
 
9.4
Gameplay 
 
9.0
Presentation 
 
10.0
Value  
 
9.0
Fun Factor 
 
9.0
Tilt 
 
10.0
Eric Layman Reviewed by Eric Layman February 10, 2009
Last updated: February 11, 2009
Top 10 Reviewer  -   View all my reviews (207)

Flower crushes game design conventions and discards them like its confection of petals. In an interview with the SCEA Blog, Chen said, "I think it's a miracle that people actually funded us to make this game," and I can definitely see where he's coming from. I'm as surprised to play and enjoy it as he was to get the chance to make it. My experience wasn't a wild success because it was different from the norm, but for the sole reason that it provided one of the purest feelings of escape I've ever received from a videogame. As a downloadable title its scope and statement may be overlooked, but, from a design standpoint, it's as "next gen" as any title yet. Flower isn't one to be missed.

Videogames

Gameplay
Interactive poetry. Gameplay is barely there in the traditional sense, but omnipresent from a different point of view. Chen didn't shy away from saying Flower defined a new genre, and I'm willing to believe him when he says it might as well be Zen.
Presentation
Flower's hands off delivery of narrative through the perfect marriage of visuals, mood, music, and atmosphere is what makes it extraordinary.
Value
It took me less than three hours to finish the game but, really, who cares? Longevity isn't the point and the initial experience cancels out any feelings of not getting your money's worth. Flower is a bargain for what it offers.
Fun Factor
Brains work differently and I'm sure some people won't fully appreciate a game so different in scope and structure. It's not for everyone, but for the intended audience, Flower is exactly what you have been waiting for.
Was this review helpful to you? 
 

User reviews

Average user rating from: 1 user(s)

Overall rating 
 
1.4
Gameplay 
 
1.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
1.0  (1)
Value  
 
3.0  (1)
Fun Factor 
 
1.0  (1)
Tilt 
 
1.0  (1)
Already have an account?
Ratings (the higher the better)
  • Gameplay
    How did the game play? Controls, functionality, etc.
  • Presentation
    How were the soundtrack, visuals, menus, attitude, etc?
  • Value
    Was the game worth the money?
  • Fun Factor
    Was it fun? Was it not?
  • Tilt
    This is your chance to skew the score outside of the stated categories.
Videogames
Comments
Please enter the security code.
http://www.gamesvideo.co
Overall rating 
 
1.4
Gameplay 
 
1.0
Presentation 
 
1.0
Value  
 
3.0
Fun Factor 
 
1.0
Tilt 
 
1.0
Reviewed by videogames December 09, 2010

videogames

http://www.gamesvideo.co

Was this review helpful to you? 
 

S5 Box

Login Form

Other Stuff